Challenges to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Ballot Access Heat Up
ATLANTA – Challengers seeking to throw Robert F. Kennedy Jr. off Georgia’s November ballot told a judge on Monday that the independent presidential candidate must be disqualified because the New York address he used on Georgia ballot access petitions is a “sham.”
It shows how a decision by a New York court last week finding Kennedy doesn’t live at the address in the New York City suburbs is being used to attack Kennedy’s ballot access in other states. The judge ruled Kennedy shouldn’t appear on New York ballots, but Kennedy is appealing.
In New York on Monday, a trial opened in suburban Long Island in another lawsuit challenging Kennedy’s place on the state’s presidential ballot in November.
In Georgia, challengers argue that because Kennedy used the New York address, his petitions should be voided.
Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
In a recent turn of events, challengers are making bold moves to disqualify Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from the ballot in Georgia’s upcoming November election. The controversy stems from the address he used on his ballot access petitions, with challengers claiming it to be a “sham” address.
The legal battle has intensified after a New York court ruled against Kennedy, questioning his residency status in the New York City suburbs. This ruling has had a domino effect, leading to challenges in other states where he seeks ballot access.
The case in Georgia is gaining traction, as challengers are adamant that Kennedy’s use of the New York address invalidates his petitions. Lawyers are presenting arguments based on evidence of Kennedy’s residency history and his party affiliation, which adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
While Democratic challengers are also challenging other independent candidates like Cornel West and third-party candidates, the focus remains on Kennedy due to the potential impact his candidacy could have in a closely contested state like Georgia.
The legal proceedings are closely watched as they could pave the way for a final ruling by Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. With the clock ticking towards the mailing of military and overseas ballots in mid-September, the outcome of these challenges will soon be known.
Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story as the legal battles continue in multiple states, highlighting the intricacies and challenges of securing ballot access in the upcoming election.
