SALT LAKE CITY – The Utah Supreme Court is set to make a crucial decision on a proposed constitutional amendment that could potentially shift power from voters to lawmakers when it comes to ballot measures. This high-stakes decision will determine whether the amendment is clear enough to be included on the November ballot.
Attorneys representing the Legislature and various voting rights groups presented their arguments before the state Supreme Court following a recent ruling by a lower court that suggested the ballot question should not be decided by voters this year.
The proposed Amendment D, if approved by Utah voters, would grant legislators the authority to modify or even revoke voter-approved ballot measures. This could significantly impact the initiative process and the ability of citizens to pass meaningful laws without interference.
Despite concerns raised by opponents of the amendment regarding potentially misleading language, the ballot summary that voters will see simply asks whether the state constitution should be amended to “strengthen the initiative process” and clarify the roles of legislators and voters.
The Supreme Court hearing highlighted the contentious debate over the wording of the ballot question. While legislators defended the clarity of the language, critics argued that important details were omitted and that the summary does not accurately reflect the consequences of the proposed amendment.
The outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision will have significant implications for the future of the initiative process in Utah. Regardless of the ruling, the proposed amendment will still appear on the November ballot, but the fate of the votes cast remains uncertain.
This legal battle stems from a previous ruling that limited lawmakers’ ability to alter laws approved through citizen initiatives. In response, legislative leaders hastily pushed for the amendment to be included on the ballot, prompting criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.
Utah Governor Spencer Cox expressed concerns about the clarity of the ballot question but deferred to the court’s judgment. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that voters have a clear understanding of the implications of the proposed changes.
As the Utah Supreme Court deliberates on this crucial issue, the future of the initiative process in the state hangs in the balance. The decision will have far-reaching consequences for the relationship between voters and lawmakers in Utah.
Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
