Are you interested in what’s happening in Texas? Subscribe to The Y’all newsletter — a weekly dispatch about the people, places, and policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists living in communities across the state.
In a recent development, a federal court overturned the authorization of two controversial, multi-billion-dollar gas export projects in far South Texas. The projects, Rio Grande LNG and Texas LNG, have faced opposition from a coalition of South Texas cities and groups, leading to this ruling. The court cited significant flaws in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) reviews of the projects, mandating the need for corrections before reconsidering authorization.
The decision has raised concerns about environmental justice, climate impacts, and procedural obligations surrounding the planned gas liquefaction and export complexes. Despite the setback, the developers now have the opportunity to seek a re-hearing within 45 days.
Both projects aim to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Texas shale gas to overseas markets, contributing to the ongoing boom in gas export projects along the Gulf Coast. While Rio Grande LNG remains committed to its construction plans, Texas LNG is assessing the impact of the court’s order on its future infrastructure.
The opposition to these projects has been driven by concerns about their environmental impact on the surrounding ecosystems, including wetlands and national wildlife refuges. Entities such as the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas have been vocal in their resistance to the destruction of archaeological sites and sacred lands.
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/ed21e5c36709ffc53a7abde9c588e785/0401%20Carrizo%20Comecrudo%20LNG%20MG%20TT%2009.jpg)
The ruling has been hailed as a victory by the tribe, emphasizing the importance of community input in such decisions. However, local politicians and industry representatives remain supportive of the projects, highlighting the economic benefits of natural gas exports.
Years of Litigation
This ruling marks the second time the court has overturned FERC’s approval of these projects, indicating persistent concerns over their environmental and social impact. The Sierra Club and other local groups have been at the forefront of challenging these projects, citing the rushed and flawed approval process by FERC.
Despite attempts to address environmental concerns, including the addition of carbon capture systems, the court found that FERC failed to adhere to proper procedures in its re-authorization of the projects earlier this year. The court’s decision underscores the importance of transparency and public input in large-scale energy projects.
Looking ahead, FERC and the developers have a window to seek a re-hearing, but advocates are calling for an immediate halt to construction pending further review. The ongoing legal battle highlights the complex interplay between energy development, environmental protection, and community engagement.
Stay informed about this evolving story and other Texas news by subscribing to The Y’all newsletter.
Don’t miss out on the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival, happening in September in Austin. Explore a diverse program covering topics from education to the economy, politics, and more. See the full program and join the conversation!
