The right to vote upheld by Arizona Supreme Court in landmark ruling
In a groundbreaking decision, the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the voting rights of nearly 98,000 individuals whose citizenship status had been in question. This ruling allows them to participate in state and local races, despite a database error that had erroneously labeled them as ineligible for the full ballot for the past two decades.
The dispute arose between Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer, with conflicting views on the eligibility of these voters. Richer sought clarification from the court, arguing that Fontes’ guidance to allow the affected individuals to vote violated state law.
Fontes defended his stance, citing concerns about equal protection and due process for voters who believed they had fulfilled the necessary requirements to participate in elections. The court ultimately sided with Fontes, emphasizing that the affected individuals had registered as citizens long ago under penalty of law and should not be penalized for a database error.
Of the nearly 98,000 impacted voters, a majority are residents of Maricopa County, ranging in age from 45 to 60 and representing various political affiliations. Arizona’s unique citizenship verification requirements make this ruling particularly significant, as the affected individuals had provided valid identification at the time of registration.
The database error, which misclassified voters who obtained driver’s licenses before 1996, raised concerns about its potential impact on tightly contested state races. While it would not have affected presidential elections, the outcome of local races and ballot measures could be influenced by this voting bloc.
Both Richer and Fontes expressed relief at the court’s decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding voter rights in the face of administrative challenges. Moving forward, election officials will work to update the documentation of potentially affected voters to prevent similar issues in future elections.
One of the impacted voters, John Groseclose, shared his gratitude for the resolution, noting the frustration of dealing with bureaucratic hurdles to rectify the error. With the court’s ruling, individuals like Groseclose can cast their votes without fear of disenfranchisement due to a decades-old mistake.
Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
