When Vice President Kamala Harris announced Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate, the last thing she probably expected was a heated debate over apostrophes. But as it turns out, grammar enthusiasts were quick to weigh in.
The selection of Walz with his unique surname sparked discussions about the use of apostrophes in possessive proper names, adding fuel to the fire that had already been smoldering since Harris’ own nomination last month.
The question of whether to add an apostrophe or apostrophe + S to singular proper nouns ending in S has divided opinion for decades. While some style guides recommend using only an apostrophe, others argue for the addition of an S.
Renowned grammar experts like Benjamin Dreyer and Ron Woloshun have weighed in on the debate, citing simplicity and clarity as key factors in determining the correct usage.
Despite the differing opinions, the consensus seems to be shifting towards adopting the apostrophe + S format for possessive proper names ending in S. Linguists like Timothy Pulju believe that this form will eventually become the standard.
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: effective communication is key, regardless of apostrophe placement. Whether it’s “Harris’s” or “Harris’ seventh trip to Nevada,” the goal remains the same – to make language work for us.
With the upcoming election, the focus may shift from apostrophes to policies, but the great apostrophe debate will continue to linger in the minds of grammar enthusiasts everywhere.
Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.