A Republican effort to lock down all of Nebraska’s electoral votes for former President Donald Trump seemed destined to fail when GOP Sen. Mike McDonnell of Omaha denied his support for the move.

McDonnell’s opposition means that Republicans lack the two-thirds majority needed to change the current electoral vote allocation system in Nebraska, which is distinctive from most other states.

Here’s a closer look at why supporters of Trump were advocating for the change, the challenges they faced, and why a single state lawmaker became the focus of national attention.

Why one of Nebraska’s electoral votes is significant

Nebraska, historically a Republican stronghold, has a unique system where electoral votes are split between the statewide winner and the winner in each congressional district. A change to a winner-take-all system could have significant implications in a close presidential race.

For instance, in the event of a tie in the Electoral College, Nebraska’s electoral votes could play a decisive role in determining the next President.

What the Nebraska lawmaker’s decision means

McDonnell’s refusal to back the proposed change underscores the complexities of altering the state’s electoral vote allocation. He suggested that such a fundamental shift should be left to the voters through a constitutional amendment.

Despite the efforts of Trump allies and the former President himself, the push to adopt a winner-take-all system in Nebraska faces significant obstacles due to political dynamics in the state.

Why supporters needed a two-thirds majority

Efforts to change Nebraska’s electoral vote allocation require a two-thirds majority due to constitutional and procedural hurdles. This high threshold has made it challenging for proponents of a winner-take-all approach to succeed.

Implications of Nebraska’s unique electoral system

Nebraska’s decision to split its electoral votes reflects a historical commitment to representational democracy and can have tangible effects on national elections, as demonstrated by recent developments.

Despite the challenges faced by proponents of changing the system, the debate over Nebraska’s electoral votes highlights the intricacies of the American electoral process and the significance of individual states in shaping election outcomes.

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.